Texas Bankruptcy Blog : Texas Bankruptcy Lawyer & Attorney : Fears Nachawati law Firm : Chapter 7, Chapter 13, Consumer Bankrutpcy : Dallas, Fort Worth, Austin, Houston, San Antonio

National banks that took federal bail-out money also agreed to participate in government home modification programs. These banks have created in-house loan negotiators to assist in home-loan modifications, which may reduce loan principle or interest to adjust the loan to an affordable rate. Many American homeowners have applied for these programs, but few have been approved. In many cases the empty promise of home loan modification leaves the homeowner in a worse position than when he started.

It has become clear that these banks are simply not playing fair. Several lawsuits have been filed against national banks alleging fraud. A federal lawsuit was recently filed by the State of Nevada Attorney General against Bank of America, the nation's largest home loan servicer, alleging deceptive practices. Additionally, a class-action lawsuit against Bank of America is pending in Massachusetts federal court. These suits claim that Bank of America deceived consumers into depleting their savings by making mortgage payments based on false hopes they'd be eligible to modify their home mortgages. The lawsuits allege that BOA accepted $25 billion from the U.S. government in 2008 as part of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), but has failed to participate in programs such as the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) aimed to minimize foreclosures.

If you are in need of a home modification, review your options with an experienced bankruptcy attorney. Many bankruptcy debtors are able to strip away a second or third mortgage, or pay past-due payment over three to five years. Bankruptcy debtors can also apply for government programs such as HAMP during the bankruptcy case, while under the protection and supervision of a federal bankruptcy court judge.
 

In 2004 and 2005, the banking industry spent millions lobbying for tougher bankruptcy laws. Washington Mutual, Bank of America Corp., JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Citigroup Inc. collectively spent $25 million during that period. The big banks' efforts paid off in a major overhaul of the Bankruptcy Code in 2005 making it more difficult for struggling families to discharge credit card debt. However, the banks did not foresee the current housing crisis, and new research suggests that the 2005 changes to the Bankruptcy Code may have caused mortgage default rates to rise.

A paper published by the National Bureau of Economic Research states that the 2005 changes “raised the cost of filing and reduced the amount of debt that is discharged" thereby making it more difficult for debtors "to shift funds from paying other debts to paying their mortgages[.]" In other words, before the 2005 changes, many debtors struggling with a mortgage arrears and credit card debt could file bankruptcy, discharge the credit card debt, and free-up money to pay the mortgage. The new bankruptcy provisions make this process more difficult. As a result, fewer debtors are able to afford to save their homes through the bankruptcy process.

Jay Westbrook, a professor of business law at the University of Texas Law School in Austin and a former adviser to the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank said, "Be careful what you wish for. [The banks] wanted to make sure that people kept paying their credit cards, and what they're getting is more foreclosures."
If you are facing overwhelming debt and want to keep your home, there are many alternatives available to you. An experienced bankruptcy attorney can review your finances and explain your legal options for discharging or repaying your debts. Bankruptcy is not the only option for saving a home from foreclosure, and many cases are successfully resolved using a combination of bankruptcy and non-bankruptcy methods. Get the facts today and solve your debt dilemma!